For machine shops and precision manufacturers

Run a clearer shop-floor operation.

See the jobs that need attention, trace the reason across your systems, and give your team a shared next step.

Start with the daily status hunt

SPOF is intended for U.S. machine shops and make-to-order manufacturers with roughly 30 to 100 employees. The useful starting point is a decision your operations team already makes: which job needs attention before the next shift, and who can remove its blocker?

A sales order may carry the customer promise while a routing holds the remaining operations. A purchasing record can explain a material delay that the production status never mentions. During discovery, identify the records people consult today, the handoffs they make, and the question that still requires someone to walk the floor.

  • Delivery: Which open job needs a due-date review?
  • Production: Which operation is moving, held, or awaiting confirmation?
  • Materials: Which requirement has no usable allocation?
  • Cost: Which recorded expense differs from the estimate?

One job, several records, a specific next step

Illustrative workflow, not a customer result: job WO-1042 is due Friday. Its routing includes milling, inspection, and outside finishing. The ERP shows the order released; an operation record shows milling complete; purchasing shows the finishing service still awaiting confirmation. Those records answer different parts of the same question.

A useful answer identifies the unresolved finishing dependency, cites when each record was last updated, and asks the planner to confirm the supplier date. It should also say that inspection duration has not been confirmed. Calling the entire job on track would conceal that missing information. The next step belongs to a named role in the shop, selected during configuration.

Define the first workflow before connecting everything

A first-project discussion should produce a bounded scope: one operational question, the required sources, the people who review the answer, and the actions they may approve. Start with representative open jobs and compare the proposed answer with the team’s current review. Include a held job, a split quantity, and a job with a missing update.

Agree on acceptance criteria before expanding. The answer should trace every material statement to a record, flag stale data, and preserve existing access restrictions. A read-only workflow can be evaluated before considering any changes to orders, schedules, or purchasing. Commercial scope, handover, and ongoing support terms need agreement for the specific project.

Bring the records and the decision owner

Accessible digital work-order records and consistent identifiers make a scope review more useful. If most progress information exists only in conversations, first decide how the shop will capture it. An operations agent cannot infer an unrecorded completion or repair an inaccurate stock balance by summarizing it.

For the first conversation, bring your ERP and shop-floor system names, one recurring bottleneck, and the role responsible for the decision. Versions, permissions, refresh needs, and available data determine what is feasible. The integration architecture explains these boundaries; the four use-case pages show the distinct fields each decision needs.

Start with one operational question.

Tell us what your team keeps looking up. We will talk through the workflow and the systems behind it.

Book a 15-minute call